Well the chance of getting up to Montebello tonight to try to take a
look again is zilch.
This thing was extremely faint and I wonder if I interpreted all the
faint stars in that spot that form a sort of broad 5 to 7' ring field
as this effect. Maybe the weekend will be ok and include it again, scan
the area.
The correction I made in my 11:44 post was it was actually at RA 10
47 33 DEC +12 52 05
If it were some comet or another that was very spherical (like a
super-mini holmes) it may have moved or was not really anything but the
background stars after all. This new scope is fun in any case and the
re-observed objects were way better in it than the old rig.
Thanks for any tips,
Mark
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jamie Dillon <ngc1023jd@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 12:40 PM
>> To: TAC <sf-bay-tac@seds.org>
>> Subject: [TAC] re: Little help on object observed last night
>>
>> An asteroid can only look like a point source; one would never show a
>> spherical shape.
>>
>> --
>> Jamie Dillon <*> ngc1023jd@gmail.com
>> "If I ever breakfasted at half-past eight
>>
>>
>> [The entire original message is not included]
>> --
>> GSSP Telescope List (Updated 5/24/08): http://tinyurl.com/5ob2th
>> TAC Stats Tracking: http://tinyurl.com/5w795e
>> Mailing list preferences: http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/sf-bay-tac
>>
>>
-- GSSP Telescope List (Updated 5/24/08): http://tinyurl.com/5ob2th TAC Stats Tracking: http://tinyurl.com/5w795e Mailing list preferences: http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/sf-bay-tacReceived on Wed May 28 20:53:44 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|