Re: I think I found the battery I need for field operations

From: John R Pierce ^lt;pierce_at_No-Spam>
Date: Fri Jul 18 2008 - 13:19:53 MST

Shane Raney wrote:
> A mailing list pointed out CATAPILLER has batteries, I ordered a
> 153-5710 PHO. See site:
> http://www.cat.com/cda/components/fullArticle?m=37407&x=7&id=241185 .
> This should last a night or two, and I will not need to worry about
> traction for a while with it in the back of my car.
>

phew, 120 lbs. how much?

i note right under the 153-5710 PHO is a similar sized VRLA (SLA), this
would be a better choice albeit probably significantly more expensive.
Since its NOT a vrla, it has vents even if there are no removable vent
caps, so this battery MUST be mounted in a ventilated battery box and
not used or charged in a confined space like a car trunk.

I was about to ask what the AH rating is, but I found the PDF with the
full specs http://www.cat.com/cda/files/192183/7/PEHJ0073.pdf

200AH at a 20 hour discharge rate (which would be 10 amps)... While
this doesn't scale linearly for lower discharge rates, its close
enough. thats a lotta pookah ! Something like 2400 watt hours... so
it would run a 100 watts of stuff for 24 hours straight (in theory... of
course in reality, there are various losses).

-- 
TAC mailing list - join or leave here: http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/sf-bay-tac
Received on Fri Jul 18 13:20:10 2008
 
TAC
TAC-SAC
Join Mailing List
Mailing List Archives
TAC-Shasta
TAC-South
Observing Reports
Observing Sites