At 4/18/2005, you wrote:
>Hmmm. Whats the problem with variables? Rather than just looking at
>"static" galaxies and such, at least there's some action. Plus its
>a hot area of research (think IBVS publications for us amateurs!)
Okay, I'll dip my toes in here and risk that I know a smidge about these
(but that's about all I know). Nothing wrong with variables. It is the
cataclysmic ones that are tricky, right? Plain old dependable variables
should be a cinch to watch!
Received on Mon Apr 18 15:51:39 2005