RE: [TAC] Least Useful

From: Bill ^lt;gatorchaser_at_No-Spam>
Date: Mon Aug 02 2004 - 16:16:53 MST

I recently ordered a broadband, narrowband and V-Blocking filters from
Orion. I hope I am not wasting my money. i will be using them on my Orion
Astroview 120ST.

By the way, I'm moving to Alameda from Louisiana in september and am
looking forward to finding a good club and a few observing sites. From
what I can tell there are a few sites that most people go to. Fremont Peak
seems to be the most popular. When I finally get set up in Alameda is
there a place I can go to get info on these sites and the various bay area
clubs?

Bill Drelling

-----Original Message-----
From: Michelle Stone [SMTP:tac4mstone@No-Spam]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 1:28 PM
To: The Astronomy Connection
Subject: RE: [TAC] Least Useful

My least useful filter is the H-Beta supposedly used for viewing B33, the
Horsehead. I think I tried it once and then I yawned. BTW, I'll sell it
for %65 of list if anyone is interested.

Michelle Stone
Argo Navis and
Custom Telescopes by Plettstone
http://www.plettstone.com/telescopes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sf-bay-tac-bounces@No-Spam [mailto:sf-bay-tac-bounces@No-Spam]On
> Behalf Of Jeff Crilly
> Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 11:41 AM
> To: The Astronomy Connection
> Subject: Re: [TAC] Least Useful
>
>
> > I began wondering if anyone uses them, and why there hasn't been a
> > comparison of moon filters.
> >
>
> I used your moon filter once, back in like 1997. I found it mildly
> useful, so I got one. It improved constrast a bit with the 8".
> With the 4", no filter is needed at high power... its dim enough.
> I prefer to use a red filter on the moon. Saves the night vision.
> The best moon I saw was with turley's purple filter.
>
> > Then I found an old Lumicon Deep Sky Filter. Never had much
> luck with it,
> > so its been sitting in the unused bin for a long time.
>
> Yep.. got one of them also -- got it on the cheap, I think. Also 1.25".
> Somewhat useful for photography (i'm told, never tried to use it). I did
> use it visual on the 13" in the backyard, and it made m51 go from
> nothing to
> ~barely~ visible -- afaict, the deepsky filter is basically an
attenuator.
>
> >
> > Anyone want to put their items on such a list (do so here,
> posting to TAC).
> >
>
> - Any kind of colored filter. I just never really could see a
> difference on the planets.
> - 5x25 finderscope.
> - inexpensive 1.25" 40mm plossl - I dunno, maybe one cant expect much.
> - fwiw, I dont use the 17mm type4 much. Too heavy.
>
>
>
Received on Mon Aug 2 15:17:24 2004


The Astronomy Connection -- Mailing List Archives