Astronomers Spot Most Distant Quasar Ever Observed

John R Pierce (pierce@No-Spam)
Thu, 13 Apr 1999 22:34:09 -0700

> Ok, I can understand that, but then how do you know that something is
> made up of, or contains enough of a particular ion? Are certain ions
> present in all objects? Is it possible that the obsorbtion is by
> another type of ion? Possibly something that has yet to be discovered?
> Is that another assumption that is made, that particular ions are
> present in all astronomical objects and not an undiscovered element?
> Are there ions that absorbe a wavelength close to what is assumed?

Regardless of what ions are present, the emission lines are very narrow and
have a very precisely defined spacing. Hydrogen in its various ion forms is
very distinctive, as are various helium isotopes, etc. They simply match up
the pattern of emission lines with the various known spectra... There are
only so many combinations. Then the offset from where these lines should be
to where they appear gives the redshift factor (or even blueshift if
something was coming at us).

The PFM and wild guessing department comes in on the assumption that the
universe is expanding uniformly and converting the redshift derived velocity
to distance.

-jrp


The Astronomy Connection -- Mailing List Archives